One of the oldest tropes in Reality TV in general (and Big Brother, specifically) is the concept of “playing with integrity.” In the real world, playing with integrity means going through life in as morally, ethically and socially right as possible. It is a fine attribute to live up to in a person’s personal and professional life. It is also a fallacy in the realm of Big Brother. “Playing with Integrity” in Big Brother strikes an entirely different meaning, when it is most often used – here, it is often used by a player to describe their game when they are being outplayed by someone smarter, quicker and more willing to adapt their strategy and gameplay to win.
In that sense, Victor’s usage of the phrase “playing with integrity” is entirely apt – at every turn, he was outplayed and out gamed by people whose own games have had issues but who shared a common enemy.
Victor came into this game essentially thinking that he would be able to run the gamut with former player Jozea and remaining player Paul. While never a leader of the group, Victor was essentially the follower that Jozea needed least at the time – someone with total loyalty. While this is admirable in the real world, in this game it is a reason to be targeted when your leader is on the outs.
Once Jozea was evicted and Paulie became HoH, the writing was essentially on the wall – and that is when Victor began saying “playing with integrity” repeatedly with the one person who still sympathized with him – Paul. It is telling that Paul, a player who was loyal to Jozea as well, was willing to adjust his gameplay and strategy to stay in the game – and succeeded – while Victor rode his game plan out of the House.
It is not entirely impossible to play Big Brother completely honestly, but the winners of this game have shown a willingness to take the necessary actions to get to the end. This includes making the necessary changes and occasional dishonest actions to ensure that the ultimate goal – winning the $500,000 – is maintained. More importantly, they showed the ability to make these decisions at the right time – a trait that Victor missed to the end.
Sadly, his departure occurs as the group dedicated to his ouster begins to fall apart in earnest. Frank’s actions have led to a bloc of players (including his returning allies) ready to make the move against him. While this does not appear to be happening due to a Bridgette win as the new Head of Household (and the assumption that she will be loyal to Frank, a move that may seal her own fate in the game), it is clear that Frank’s own strategy may need to be adjusted before he is the next target for eviction.
The best players of Big Brother have adjusted their strategies and styles to win the game. Those who cannot make such an adjustment have been doomed to an early exit in the past.
At least they, like Victor, can claim to have “played with integrity.”
Week 3 Results:
Week 3 Head of Household: Paulie
Paulie’s week went perfectly. From ensuring his role in the larger game with key alliances being built, to ensuring Victor was taken out of the game with a true Backdoor strategy, Paulie made sure his week counted. Paul has shown better gameplay than his brother in early results, and it is good to see that the older Caliafiore has learned well from the experiences of Cody two years prior.
Week 3 Roadkill Winner: Victor, nominated Tiffany
While this had little effect on Victor’s overall game, his act of nominating Tiffany paid off in dividends for the remainder of the house, Tiffany’s inability to deal with the nomination well led to much drama on her part, and further fracturing of the 8 Pack alliance. In the end, it may lead indirectly to Tiffany’s own eviction eventually.
Week 3 Veto Winner: Paulie, removed Paul, Victor Nominated.
Paul really did have an extremely successful week. By winning Veto, Paul ensured that Victor was backdoor and eliminated.
Week 3 Evictee: Victor
At least he played with integrity.
Week 3 Player of the Week: Paul
While this may not be the person many would expect, consider this – Paul went from a definite target to safety in the span of hours with a willingness to adjust his gameplay and work with the others. In doing so, Paul isn’t seen as a person to take out any time in the next few weeks – a shift that essentially gets him to Jury, should he play his cards right. Paul rebounded well this week, and while he is a polarizing player for good reason he is still playing successfully.
Week 3 Goat of the Week: Frank
Few players have seen their stock fall so quickly as Frank this week. At the beginning of the week, Frank looked poised to stay afloat in the game for several weeks – now, it will be a surprise if he lasts two more weeks. His overplaying and multiple alliance-building sessions have manage dot do one thing – get back to the people who were most familiar with how he played before. Frank will have to rebuild heavily to stay n the game long term, and his past unwillingness to compromise may show to be his weakness.
Week 3 Game Move of the Week: Victor nominates Tiffany as Roadkill Nominee.
While this did little to help Victor, his nomination of Tiffany set in motion several other key events – Frank’s decision to target Tiffany, her own paranoid fears about the other alliance members coming to light, Tiffany’s attempt to win the Veto competition (Which had the result of Da’Vonne getting upset with Tiffany), Da’Vonne’s targeting of Tiffany and the eventual realization that Frank was working against the overall alliance and more for himself. Quite a bit of drama can be developed from this one act, one that could have benefitted Victor more had he not told everyone he had one the Roadkill competition.